Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ºÒ¼ÒµµÆ÷ ½ÃÇà½Ã±â¿¡ µû¸¥ º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø ÃæÀü¹°ÀÇ »ó¾ÆÁú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ

Effect of topical fluoride application using iontophoresis on retention of composite resin restorations

´ëÇѱ¸°­º¸°ÇÇÐȸÁö 2007³â 31±Ç 2È£ p.185 ~ 192
¹ÚÁöÇö, ·ùÇö, Á¶ÀÚ¿ø,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹ÚÁöÇö ( Park Ji-Hyon ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Á¤Ã¥°æ¿µ´ëÇпø ±¸°­º¸°ÇÇаú
·ùÇö ( Riew Hyun ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
Á¶ÀÚ¿ø ( Cho Ja-Won ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate appropriate timing of topical fluoride application using iontophoresis in case of composite resin restoration for non-carious cervical lesions.

Methods: Eighty teeth were sound premolars extracted for the orthodontic treatment and randomly assigned to 4 groups. According to the timing of topical fluoride application (TPA), groups divided into 1) 1 st group (control group): ordinary composite resin filling, 2) 2nd group: TPA before acid etching, 3) 3rd group: TPA after acid etching, 4) 4th group: TPA after composite resin filling. The effect of topical fluoride application on retention of restorations was tested by shear bond strength.

Results: Average shear bond strength was 39.84 N/mm2 in control group, 40.52 N/mm2 in 2nd group, 36.71N/mm2 in 3rd group and 40.39 N/mm2 in 4th group. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) testing revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in all groups (JJ ) 0.05).

Conclusions: It would be better to apply topical fluoride using iontophoresis before composite resin filling for non-carious cervical lesions. It will help to reduce the dentinal hypersensitivity of patients and practitioners could expect better results of restorations.

Å°¿öµå

º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÃæÀü; ºÒ¼ÒÀ̿µµÆ÷; Áö°¢°ú¹Î; Ä¡°æºÎ¸¶¸ðÁõ
cervical abrasion; composite resin restoration; dentinal hypersensitivity; iontophoresis; topical fluoride application

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed